|
During an interview recently with a young student who attended a
flexi-school in South East Queensland it emerged her daily trip to
the school took 90 minutes (when the buses were on time). It also
emerged that on the way to school she passed several other
'mainstream' schools - the closest of which was just a 5 minute walk
from her home. So why does she do that - why put up with a long trip
on an unreliable public transport system every day to get to her 'flexi-school', when
she could stroll just a few minutes down the road to the local high
school?
These are some of the questions that YANQ and researchers from the
University of Queensland (UQ) and Griffith University (GU) hope to
answer in a research project that began at the start of the year. The
research is being supported and guided by an advisory group that
includes youth workers, educators and researchers from youth
services, flexi-schools, non-government schools as well as UQ, GU,
and the Queensland University of Technology (QUT).
The aim of the research is to:
-
Identify the factors that allow 'flexi' schools and learning
centres (which we'll call flexi-schools for now) to retain and
re-engage young people who would otherwise not be engaged in
education; and
-
To identify which of these factors are transferable to
traditional schooling (and how).
Staff and students from five flexi-schools in South East
Queensland have been involved in the research. Students and staff of
those centres were recently invited to a workshop in which they could
see and give feedback on the initial findings.
Initial Findings
Some common themes have already started to emerge from the
research after just a brief analysis of the interviews with students.
Keeping in mind that these are just initial impressions emerging from
the data, here are some comments on what we've found so far.
First, we can say that the profile of a flexi-school student is a
very diverse one, and that the reasons they maintain connections to
flexi-schools related to the schools environment, the programs it
offers and the style of teaching. Students who attend flexi-schools
might be parents or they might be homeless or they may just prefer
the way that flexi-schools teach them. They often have clear goals of
what they want to achieve and might be looking for specific
qualifications. Some students are returning to education after a long
absence. Many prefer the smaller schools/classes and many did not
like some aspect of their previous school. The age range of students
is very diverse too - ranging from early teens through to early
20s.
While the backgrounds of the students was very diverse, one common
element was the high ambitions and strong work ethic that many of
them had. Many students were able articulate very clear strategies
for achieving their goals. Many of the students also put a great deal
of effort into attending school - some juggled work and/or caring
responsibilities while others travelled significant distances to
maintain their connection to learning.
Another common factor amongst the students was their
identification of what they liked about flexi-schools and the factors
that attracted them to flexi-schools in the first place. One such
factor was the environment that flexi-schools created - in
particular the following aspects of the environment:
"Cause you get flexible hours here and stuff
so if you're working then you can pick a day like you need to do
subjects on, kind of thing. So if you working like on Wednesday
or Tuesday's or whatever, just work the other days that you're
not doing work here
"The support, the fact that it has free
childcare and I can actually do my schooling as well as be a
parent."
"... I know that if my friends weren't here I could
just go up to someone and say, ‘hi' and you know they'd like
come back at you with respect."
-
Positive. The positive focus of schools was also
important, both in terms of young people feeling 'celebrated' (not
just accepted), as well as a focus on educational outcomes and the
sense of achievement that comes with that. For example:
"Mum's happy for me because she knew I
wasn't the person who liked school and she thought I was going
to become a failure and then I told her ‘Mum, I'm doing a
course now and it's a lot better than school' and she's happy
as for me yeah."
"The [school] does well, I think how they do
the community group meetings and stuff, bringing everyone together
and sorting out conflicts and everyone having their say. And
these little meetings [are] a really good thing they do because it
lowers the chances of anyone having any sort of fights or
arguments so everyone has their own opinion - so it brings
people together as a one community."
The other two areas that have been identified in the research so
far as factors of success are the learning programs that the
flexi-schools/learning centres offer, along with the method of
teaching.
The variety of learning programs is clearly important. This
includes the short term practical courses, longer term vocational
courses as well as academic subjects offered as part of year 10
through to year 12. Students also enjoyed doing the other learning
programs many of the sites offered, such as music, art, photography
and life-skills courses among others.
The method of teaching is another key factor that students
discussed. In particular students talked about enjoying more
conversational (two-way) modes of teaching and the opportunities this
opened to build relationships with teachers and other staff. Students
also valued the hands-on, practical methods of teaching, as well as
the opportunities they had to get one-to-one support from staff.
Analysis of the interviews will continue between now and the end
of the year. The final report on the research will be published in 2010, it will include recommendations on how the factors of
success that we identify can be incorporated by traditional schools
so that all young people can benefit from a supportive, respectful
educational environment.
For more information about tis project please contact David at YANQ on 07 3844 7713
or email
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
This article was written by David Powell, based on a presentation by Prof. Martin Mills (UQ), Dr. Glenda McGregor (GU) and Dr Sandra Taylor in July 2009. |