|
By the Youth Affairs Network of Queensland.
Download this paper: Multiculturalism - From Myth to Reality 99.23 Kb
In a global context,
recent events around the world and at home necessitate an open public
debate on multiculturalism and to form effective strategies for
community engagement with this issue. Oft times, even within the
Community Services Sector, many organisations are increasingly
regarding ‘multiculturalism' as being solely related to issues
regarding non-English speaking migrants and refugees. This
interpretation and use of ‘multiculturalism' not only denies the
role of English speaking migrants, residents and citizens, but also
fails to acknowledge the important contributions that Indigenous
peoples play in the construction of effective multiculturalism.
Indeed, alienating English speakers and Indigenous peoples by denying
them a place within concepts of multiculturalism, may serve instead
to reinforce the ‘us and them' mentality amongst some members of
the wider community, in which the somewhat ignorant ideologies of
assimilation and total conformity to mainstream ‘Anglo' culture
is a goal.
Identity is a
multifaceted concept, with contributing elements such as nationality,
nationhood, indigeneity, ethnicity, religion, ‘race', language
and gender playing significant roles. Further contestations arise
when people misuse and confuse the terms and implications of
ethnicity and nationality. The latter referring - in layman's
terms at least - to a person's country of citizenship. When used
in this manner, as it is in most state and federal government forms,
nationality is a purely political, arguably somewhat arbitrary
(though still an important), bureaucratic element of identity.
Conversely, and more aligned with its anthropological definition, the
term may also relate more closely to nationhood - the state of
belonging to a particular group of people from the same ethnic and
linguistic family (eg. A person of the American Indian Cherokee
nation). This latter use of ‘nation' entwines more closely with
ethnicity; a far more prominent facet of identity whether by choice
or otherwise of people who are minority group members in a wider
society-state. ‘Sense of belonging' incorporates both
nationality, and ethnicity, but often, minority group members are
forced into relating more intimately with their ethnic identity than
their nationality (in this case used as citizenship) when confronted
by others who question their right to belong.
The Encarta Concise
English Dictionary defines multiculturalism as "relating to,
consisting of, or participating in the cultures of different
countries, ethnic groups or religions" while online dictionaries
define it as "the preservation of different cultures or cultural
identities within a unified society, as a state or nation". In
view of these definitions, by denying Anglo-Australians in particular
a role within multiculturalism, we not only deny that they have
culture, but (due to their majority) also simultaneously label them
as the base to which all other peoples must conform in order to be
‘Australian'. Similarly, by denying Indigenous peoples a role,
we not only deny that they have culture, but fail to recognise their
vital role as the first peoples of the land in which we all now live.
The Youth Affairs Network
of Queensland (YANQ) is of the view that currently there is an
absence of whole-of-society commitment to multiculturalism due to:
- The existence of a
major power imbalance between cultures in Australia;
- The dominance of the
Anglo culture in processes, systems and institutions;
- Lack of cultural
equity, limiting the participation of minority cultures in
contributing to policy aims and objectives; and
- Not acknowledging
the culture of the Indigenous people as the basis for
multiculturalism in Australia.
Therefore, YANQ believes
that the current framework for multiculturalism is heavily ingrained
in the structures and processes of the dominant culture, of which
non-dominant cultures become subjects of prejudice and discrimination
as a result of the unchallenged dominant culture. This inevitably
leads to the weakening of the base on which multiculturalism is built
upon, as multiculturalism is pursued on existing dominant culture's
structures and processes, with the non-dominant cultural groups
forced to conform to the so-called "multicultural" framework of
the dominant culture. It flows that culturally diverse communities
cannot identify with the dominant culture's vision for
multiculturalism, becoming distant from the vision itself. Diagram
1.0 is a visual representation of the existing multicultural
framework.
Diagram 1
If the existing
framework's processes and structures continue to perpetuate the
dominant culture and are not founded on a strong unified base, there
is a potential for disharmony within and across communities, making
them vulnerable to prejudice and discrimination.
To move beyond the
existing framework for multiculturalism, YANQ firmly believes that
the first cultures of Indigenous people must be acknowledged as a
basis for multiculturalism, ensuring that the Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander people are recognised for their influential role in
laying the foundation for cultural diversity in Australia. These
first cultures on which other cultures can be built, provide strength
for cultural harmony in Queensland and Australia.
YANQ sees the need for
diverse cultural input into the framework for multiculturalism in
order to achieve a shared understanding and commitment to
multiculturalism in Australia. Diagram 1.1 depicts the proposed
framework for multiculturalism.
Diagram 1.1
In the above diagram, the
key elements in the proposed framework are:
- Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Island culture as a founding base for multiculturalism
- Layers of other
cultures built upon the base of the first Indigenous culture
- Processes involving
planning, engagement and implementation
- Structure including
systems and institutions are constantly challenged and evolving
through diverse cultural input and processes
- Diverse cultural
input from all cultures including Aboriginal and Torres Straight
Islander culture, CALD groups, inter-faith groups, Anglo culture and
the wider community
- A shared vision for
multiculturalism that is underpinned by processes, structures and
diverse community input firmly established on a strong foundation
The proposed framework
allows individuals and groups across all cultures in Australia to
contribute towards the achievement of multiculturalism through active
and continuing engagement in the policy debate.
Ultimately, if
multiculturalism is treated as an old politically correct buzz word
which has passed its used by date, we will revert back to the
assimilation policy. This top down process will allow the dominant
culture to maintain its cultural hegemony in Australia.
Alternatively the
Non-Government Organisation (NGO) sector can rise up to the challenge
by facilitating diverse cultural input into the multicultural
framework in order to achieve a shared understanding and commitment
to multiculturalism in Australia.
Australia is multi ethnic
but remains a mono-culture society, insofar as Anglo Australian
culture is continued to be identified simultaneously as ‘without'
culture, and as the base to which all others should conform.
Multiculturalism is the aspiration of Australian citizens who believe
in the strength in our cultural diversity.

This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License. It can be
shared under the conditions specified by this license at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/au/.
|