|
Being an Educated Consumer of "ADHD" Research - Introduction |
|
Tuesday, 28 February 2006 |
|
Page 5 of 6
4. The false underlying premise
Finally, even if researchers found a
consistent difference between children who act a certain way ("ADHD")
and children who don't, and even if they could somehow prove that the
difference caused the behaviours, there is no reason to believe there
is any "disorder". There may be physiological differences
between people who are right-handed and left-handed, or people who
prefer the colour red over the colour blue. But it doesn't make
either group "sick".
We know that people have individual
physical differences, but it is dangerous ground to say that those
differences are a "disorder", just because they are in the
minority, or because they cause problems with fitting into society's
rigid structures (like public school). So all these millions of
dollars are being spent to try to prove something which will, if
proven, be meaningless. Maybe children with higher activity levels,
or children with shorter attention spans, or children who don't like
doing their homework, tend to have some physical difference. That
will still not prove that "ADHD" exists as a valid
"disorder".
|