|
Download this article 90.71 Kb
Back to new Transitions - Re-Engagement Edition
Author's note: I am not advocating the following for every boy or excluding girls. I am offering a suggestion for those boys who are not ‘succeeding’ academically in our education system. The paper is meant to provoke thought and initiate discussion.
What harm are our modern society and education
systems doing to our boys?
As a mother of four boys, a school teacher, a TAFE
teacher, employment consultant and a career adviser I have
encountered a lot of boys either in the education system or as early
school leavers looking for work. A large proportion of these would
be considered ‘failures' due to low academic achievement in the
education system. At the beginning of their secondary education these
boys have varying talents and potential. How then, do they get to the
stage where they drop out of school, can't get a job and may be
exhibiting anti-social behaviour?
Modern society
Our society has ‘progressed' so much that we
no longer have the choices of outdoor, physical work that young males
had in previous generations.
Our expectations are skewed towards academic
success. Everyone has different talents and abilities. A child is
not ‘dumb' just because they don't achieve academically. It is
a matter of identifying them and fostering in them something that
will benefit the child and society. We don't need to devalue
academic ability. We do need to give equal value to non-academic
skills and abilities.
What can these young males contribute to our
society?
Scenario from our past
Boy lives at home with two parents and numerous
extended family members nearby. As he progresses through adolescence
he is surrounded by male role models. The extended family live just
around the corner. Roaming around the streets, playing with his
friends, he grows up, knowing the people who do the plumbing, or
repair the roads or sell the groceries. If he lives in a city or a
town he is getting pocket money by doing deliveries. If he lives in
the country he is doing chores around the farm. At 14 he is
considered old enough to leave school and gets a job on the railway,
on a farm, with a tradey or in a shop. There are countless outdoor
occupations to choose from.
At an age where hormones are causing all sorts of
behaviour he is out mixing with older males learning how to be a man.
He has started the growing up that happens in a work environment
where there are male role models.
Scenario from today
Boy lives at home, maybe in a single parent
family, with no male relatives nearby. Today families are smaller and
scattered. The extended family doesn't live just around the corner.
Due to safety concerns he may have to stay inside after school.
Leisure activities are much more likely to be sedentary and occur
within the four walls of the home. At fourteen he is considered only
to be in the early part of his high school education. The casual, or
after school, jobs available to him are usually in hospitality or
customer service. TV means he has a broader vicarious knowledge of
possible occupations but our modern society has disabled him when it
comes to knowing the people in these jobs. He can't leave school
because he would be considered a drop out. If he did, society would
consider him well on the way to being unemployable.
Education Systems
The reduced intimacy with males in real jobs is
exacerbated by our education system. Our schools are predominantly
female orientated. Most teachers are female, especially in infants
and primary schools. Classroom learning has evolved to suit females.
Reading, writing and sitting still are measures of success. The kids
who do this are getting the positive feedback. Consider our genetic
history - who sat in the cave and nurtured and communicated?
What were the males doing? They were out hunting
and actively solving problems. How far removed in evolution are our
boys from our hunter ancestors? It is in the genetic blueprint of our
boys to learn by doing. Our education systems expect them to sit
still and listen. Instead we have hormonal teenage boys who learn by
doing, by being active. We are doing the proverbial ‘fitting square
pegs into round holes'.
The result
Outcomes from the current system include
behavioural problems that impact on teachers, on other students, on
families and on society as a whole. But what about the view these
young men have of themselves? We are turning out young males with low
self-esteem who exhibit aggressive and anti-social behaviour. What
impact is that going to have on future generations?
Talk to any disengaged young male about what they
want to do and invariably it is something outside and/or something
with their hands. They don't want to sit in an office all day. They
have been sitting in a classroom for the last ten years. They know
they are not suited to it. I'm sure all of the teachers who have
had to cope with behavioural problems in the last five years would
also agree. So why are we keeping these boys at school? Is their
literacy going to improve once they get to high school, if they hate
being there? The longer they are in the traditional school system the
more the cycle escalates and any positive view they have of their
role in society fades.
Alternative scenario
Boy starts to spend a few days a week from the
beginning of high school at work for which he receives pocket money.
He is in practical, work-related and living skills, literacy and
numeracy classes. He also has electives where he can choose to do
other high school subjects in class or on-line.
At an early age, before he becomes a
‘behavioural', problem he is out there mixing with males,
learning hands-on practical skills and being exposed to the real need
for literacy and numeracy.
If we have this type of a flexi-school how do we
avoid creating a second best system for marginalised young people? By
not considering them as marginalised in the first place. The only way
we can stop this, is by valuing all education and ability, not just
academic. We need to bring back the regard and esteem for jobs that
people get when they are fourteen. These have become the poorest paid
despite often being the hardest work. Academic success at school age
is seen as a necessity for success in life. We must work to change
attitudes that measure success.
The recent proliferation of ‘men's sheds' is
a step in the right direction. Can we incorporate this into our
education systems? Trade schools and Australian Technical Colleges
are positive moves but in the political football that education has
become we seem to lose sight of the real reason they should be in
existence. Not to make a particular, state or political party or
government funded programme look good, not to say, ‘Hey we're
great, because we're doing something about the skill shortage'.
But to give our boys real skills, a chance of success in life and
build strong, confident people with great self esteem.
We need the untapped manual dexterity, the active
problem solving, the divergent thinking, the persistence and the
energy of these wonderful young people.
Strong, confident young people help build a
strong, confident, skilled nation.
About the Author
Wendy holds a BA, Dip Ed and a Grad Cert in Career
Counselling and is the mother of four boys.
Wendy grew up in rural NSW. After completing a
Bachelor of Arts, majoring in Psychology and Australian History, and
a Diploma in Education at the University of New England she taught in
a small school in the Northern Territory for three years. She has
over fifteen years experience in western NSW working with the
unemployed as a part time teacher with TAFE NSW and as an employment
consultant. Following the completion of a Graduate Certificate in
Career Counselling in 2005 she worked as the Regional Industry Career
Adviser in Western NSW, under the Australian Government Initiative,
Career Advice Australia. She is currently working on writing
Adopt-a-School Programmes with Rural Skills Australia, is a partner
in a small office solutions business, Grey Matter Management, and is
back teaching job seeking skills and workplace communication subjects
with TAFE. She is also mother of one plant mechanic (who now works in
mining and earns way more than his mother), one auto electrician (who
we struggled to keep in school until the end of year 10 and who
bought a house the day he turned eighteen), one apprentice motor
vehicle mechanic (who bought a brand new ute as a second year
apprentice ) and one university graduate (who thought he would earn
big $$$$ but is still waiting!).
|